Over the last few weeks, it seems every article I read is about taxes. There are articles discussing the merits of the Paul Ryan tax plan; there are articles about President Obama’s Buffet rule tax plan and of course there are the articles about the tax rates of both Mr. Romney and President Obama.

The issue I have with all these discussions about taxes and tax rates is that they never tell you if they are talking about marginal or effective tax rate. Why does it matter? It matters because using one versus the other can lead to very different conclusions about what is a reasonable tax rate and how much someone pays at the end of the day. There is a lot of loose talk about marginal tax rates and average tax rates (also called effective tax rates). The intermingled and often incorrect usage of these two different rates is distorting the numbers bantered about in the tax debate and confusing the whole discussion.

So what is the difference?

- Your
**marginal tax rate**is the rate of tax you pay on each additional dollar of income you earn. In most news stories this is the tax rate being discussed because it requires no calculation. The top marginal tax rate for federal taxes in 2012 is 35%. So if that is your marginal tax rate and you get a $100 dollar raise, you will pay 35 dollars more in tax than before. - Your
**effective or average tax rate**is the rate of tax you actually pay on your whole income. It is affected by the different brackets of income you have earned and needs to be calculated (see below). The discussion of how much taxes Mr. Romney and President Obama pay is all about their effective tax rate — the rate of tax they actually pay.

Now how can these two different rate distort the tax debate? Let’s look at an example.

Let’s say you are single and you make $50,000 from a salaried job with no investment income and no deductions; then your **marginal** **federal tax rate** is 15%. This means you pay 15% on ‘the next dollar’ after $50,000 and every dollar thereafter. You will then add your state tax of say 9% and payroll taxes (social security and medicare) of 7.65% (temporarily reduced to 5.56% for 2011 and 2012). Now, you might think that your effective tax rate is around 32% (15+9+7.65=31.65%). This is wrong but this is exactly the way that the media, clients and writers of comments on news article often talk about taxes. I think this is the basis for a lot of the idea that taxes are too high.

Now, lets look at the actual effective tax rate of our hypothetical tax payer. If we assume for simplicity that you have no deductions, at an income level of $50,000 then your **effective federal tax rate** is actually 8.96%. How is that you ask? First, everyone gets the standard deduction and personal exemption which totals to $9,500. This is an amount you don’t pay taxes on at all. This means your taxable income is really only $40,500. Next, because the tax code is *progressive *you actually pay a 10% marginal rate on income under $17,400. You only pay the 15% marginal rate on income above $17,401. Therefore, once you average all of this out, your effective rate of federal tax is lower than the 15% marginal rate, just 8.96%.

You can use a calculator such as this take-home-pay calculator from calculator.net to find out what your total effective tax rate from earned income will be before deductions including state and payroll taxes. I ran the same state rate as in my marginal tax rate calculations and the **effective overall tax rate is 24% (23.6%) and not 32%** derived from using only marginal rate figures.

So without doing anything different in income or rates I have shaved 8% off “your tax.” This is why it is important to know when people are quoting tax rates which one they are using. It’s the same reason there are laws to require discussions about interest rates to be done in APR. There are many other ways to discuss interest, but to allow consumers fair comparison among lenders they need to be using the same calculations so you can be sure you are comparing apples to apples.

To allow a fair discussion about tax policy and fairness we all need to be using the same numbers.

on April 28, 2012 at 4:30 am |The Laughable Economic Fallacies Embraced By Progressives – John Malcolm[…] Marginal vs Effective Tax Rates (financiallyou.com) […]

on June 4, 2012 at 11:50 pm |Did Tax Cuts for the Rich Create the Great Divergence? « Trenz Pruca's Journal[…] Marginal vs Effective Tax Rates (financiallyou.com) Share this:FacebookLinkedInTwitterStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]

on July 9, 2014 at 4:10 pm |MarianIt’s hard to find your blog in google. I found it on 19 spot, you should build quality backlinks ,

it will help you to get more visitors. I know how to help

you, just type in google – k2 seo tricks

on August 29, 2014 at 3:29 pm |VivianI read a lot of interesting articles here. Probably you spend a lot of time writing, i

know how to save you a lot of work, there is an online tool

that creates high quality, SEO friendly articles in minutes,

just type in google – laranitas free content source